I want to get serious for a moment. Seriously.
I had a reader send me a positive comment on my last few posts specifically and all of my posts for 2018 to date. "Knocking it out of the park" were his exact words. The trouble is, I am beginning to wonder a) what park am I playing in and b) is it still legal to hit a grand slam home run for conservative values in The West.
My last few posts have been leading to this one for a while now, without my conscious knowledge. While I enjoy writing, one fact is becoming increasingly clear for me.
It is no longer legal in Canada to have a conservative opinion on anything.
I screen capped this Tweet by Jordan Peterson because it highlights precisely why anyone with a conservative voice, especially in Canada and the UK, needs to seriously consider what he says in any public space, digital or physical. It also proves to me why Jordan Peterson has gone to great lengths to be very, very precise in his speech. JP has been a real shit disturber, there is no doubt about that when you look at all the negative press he gets from the left/feminists etc. But he is also getting a lot of shit thrown his way from the right for not calling a spade a spade and refusing to see truths that are becoming plainly evident for everyone with a brain to see.
Am I allowed to write them?
My fan encouraged me to keep writing because my writing is as much for me as it is for the readers. He is correct. This blog is cathartic in the sense it allows me a place to share what's in my head with (hopefully) sympathetic minds, allowing all of us to feel less alone in our thoughts and beliefs about the current state of The West.
The trouble is, as you can see from the above direct citation of Canadian law...
While it may still be legal for you to read my words, it is becoming increasing illegal for me to write them.
Did I "willfully promote hatred" when I wrote that Christianity is what made The West the best?
A regular reader and commenter on that article noted that writing such a glowing assessment of Christianity's affect on Western culture would "lose me a lot of readers." Perhaps, but maybe it is not losing readership I need to be worrying about. Is there a single, currently enshrined in the Canadian Human Rights Code "group" who I did not offend with that post? Feminists. LGBT. Islamists. Leftists. Atheists.
It is now a hate crime to offend someone in Canada.
That is what this law is - an offence speech law protecting "any identifiable group" from being offended, thus constituting "hate" toward it. This... is the sophistry that is cultural Marxism and it has now so thoroughly infected the Canadian legal system as to effectively render it null and void. There is no more rule of law in Canada, but rule of the opinion of those holding the reigns of power. We all know which groups this legal wording refers to. In theory, this could apply to Christians and conservatives, but you know it won't.
I have been having some rather... odd glitches with DISQUS the past few months.
At first it was working regularly with zero issues. Every post had a DISQUS comment box load. I wrote an article on the world's oldest profession and when I posted it, it did have a DISQUS comments box. Which stopped loading completely in less than 24hrs when a regular reader DM'ed me on Twitter to let me know. I checked and sure enough... gone. Checked past posts, comments still loading. The following week's post had DISQUS back again with no issue and worked through to the end of 2017 and most of early 2018.
Then, just recently, I had two posts on the same weekend go up with no comments. DISQUS was now loading completely at random. Even old random posts from early 2017 no longer had DISQUS comments loading (i.e from Jan 2017!) when they had been before. I would like to believe this is a technical/coding issue, but my site's code has been fixed for a year now, so it's not linked to my core blogging software platform in my opinion.
The DISQUS problem can only be content because it loads on some posts, but not others. It can't be a script/loading issue either. If it was, there would be errors. My DISQUS "problem" is a complete denial of access to the DISQUS platform... for certain posts, apparently at random. I can confirm that the script is running because some posts load up comments just fine, while for others, the comments box simply does not even try to load or error, it just disappears. All of this smacks of a rather clumsy and clunky bit of AI soft censorship, or the even cruder hand of a real person monitoring God knows how many embedded DISQUS discussions on blogs and deciding which ones will be allowed to have a discussion at all.
I think the public denial of the DISQUS platform to Return Of Kings was to send a message - full blown censorship is coming.
As small as my blog is, even I may be being targeted for my conservative voice. I am nearing 200 views a day, but nowhere even close to ROK in terms of public exposure, and yet, I am having glitches with DISQUS that reek of an algorithm of censorship.
What does this discussion of DISQUS soft censorship have to do with going to jail for having a conservative voice?
I was going to insert an image here... but have decided to link to my answer instead.
Would any of those images "offend" a "group" and be considered "hate"? What if someone found such an image on my blog and decided to make it a court case? Could I go to jail for merely reporting the "offense" of someone else who has already been tried by the laws of his country and sentenced? Please understand... my reasoning is not crazy talk. If you even chuckle at the thought "we [The West] are not that far gone just yet", you are living in a fantasy land.
Count Dankula is now going to jail... for a joke.
Is it really all that of a legal stretch to suggest that a blog, by whom authorities have the sole discretion of labeling an "alt-right" and "conservative" voice "promoting hate", can thus lay criminal charges against at any time?
Mark Meechan, of Coatbridge in Lanarkshire, was found guilty of communicating a "grossly offensive" video in a Scottish court on Tuesday.
The next step after soft censorship, is legal action and going to jail.
If you are not already a voice as big as Roosh, or Lauren Southern or Tommy Robinson, a voice too big for them to remove from the public eye without the masses noticing... you are at risk.
Mark Meechan is proof of this. All small traditional and conservative voices out there, including me right now with this blog and this post and any further ones, are at risk of serious legal consequences and jail time. We are "free" at the whim of our Marxist, SJW, totalitarian overlords. This is what Jordan Peterson was communicating in his tweet on the legel wording behind Canada's new offence speech laws.
Globalists witnessed the absolutely crushing devestation of truth in the 2016 US Presidential election.
It happened. They were blindsided. But they will NOT let it happen again. And they WILL punish any new voice who attempts to become such a warrior for truth.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wants to track the vast networks of journalists, bloggers and other "media influencers" through a massive, searchable database that will allow them to monitor "any and all" trends in real time, according to a publicly posted job listing.
Apparently the NSA doesn't share their toys with DHS...
The DHS "Media Monitoring" initiative is currently seeking a contractor who can provide DHS with the ability to track over 290,000 global news sources in more than 100 languages - including online, print, bradcast, cable, radio, trade and industry publications, traditional news sources and social media platforms.
Give that a read and know that the denial and permanent ban of Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone...
and Lauren Southern...
from entry to the UK was ANOTHER very public demonstration of the reality of being a conservative voice now in The West.
Notice as well that Tommy Robinson is now being given pretty free reign to do just about whatever he wants... so long as his "message of hate" has one and ONLY one target... Islam and Muslims. I believe Tommy has become a pressure escape valve for the globalists. A voice of public dissent that will hopefully keep the masses from actually rising up and doing something so long as they can point to Tommy and say someone is "saying" something about the problem of Muslim immigration in the UK and Europe. Sadly, I believe Alex Jones and Infowars are also a sanctioned globalist voice of dissent. Let me be clear though, that does not mean Tommy and Alex are not true patriots, I believe they are. I just don't believe that it's possible they have not been "communicated" with by globalists as to how far they are "allowed" to foment dissent.
Did I just publicly utter statements against an identifiable group that causes offense (i.e. hatred)?
Is the mere mention of Tommmy Robinson's name enough to qualify as offense and hate speech?
All the above voices, whether you agree or disagree with them personally or intellectually, are big enough that globalists can't do anything legal to shut them up without backlash. (i.e. outright throw them all in jail this very minute)
But Count Dankula? Maximus?
This is how the purge of conservative voices against the globalists will happen - they will silence the smaller ones joining the fight, and monitor and "communicate" to the larger ones just how far they are allowed to go.
Look. I want to save The West as much as anyone does who still gives a shit about it.
Is starting a blog good strategy? A YouTube channel? They are criminalizing free speech for only one group - conservative's and Christians.
How long will it be before web hosts are required by law to report such violations of oppressive/hate speech to the government and shut you down in order to simply avoid huge financial legal fines?
Are they reporting us already?
Is my real name on a list right now that I have no awareness of until I try to fly into a country with real teeth and enforcement behind "hate" speech that is "offensive?"
Understand this - no one is safe, not even The President of the United States.
Despite the nature of Cohen's relationship with Trump and his role in the Trump Organization, Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz warned Monday during an appearance on Fox News that the FBI raid was an assault on the privileged lawyer-client relationship. Dershowitz said the raid was an attempt to turn Cohen against Trump.
"This may be an attempt to squeeze Cohen," he said. "He's the lawyer, he's the guy who knows all the facts about Donald Trump, and to get him to turn against his client. This is a very dangerous day today for lawyer-client relations," he added.
But most importantly, Cohen said the raid was so dangerous because it gives the FBI the option of deciding which information seized from Cohen should be pursued. Zerohedge - Here's Why The Cohen Raid Will Keep The Trumps Up At Night
This... is big. Seriously. Do not ignore this. (And was noted in the comments, the raid occurred during the fire at Trump Tower) It's not just Canada and the UK, Russia just introduced some pretty scary and draconian "fake news" legislation itself. Do I even need to point to China? This is where The West is headed and you better wake up before it's too late. Is it already too late?
We all have to decide what is the best course of action to Save The West.
I am beginning to increasingly believe... the best course of action is to stop all this digital protesting. Yes, that is what it is. Blogging, Twitter, anything in social media where conservatives are trying to become a "voice" is nothing but a digital form of protesting and it is just as ineffective as the real life version is.
Tommy Robinson was banned from Twitter for this interview.
Tommy will claim till he is blue in the face that it was for reporting on the M___im grooming gang scandal, but it was not.
LORD PERASON: Unless we all WAKE UP, unless these great movements, unless the football lads, and the veterans and everything get themselves organized into a POLITICAL MOVEMENT...
Obviously I think, personally, the only thing I think they can do is to join UKIP. Because UKIP is the only political party that can take this [Islam in the UK] on in any way at all.
TOMMY: You think currently now, UKIP's leadership under Gerard Batten can take on [globalists] and give the working class people a voice.
LORD PEARSON: I've told them, you can walk... march as much as you want, a million people marched against the Iraq war. I can't remember how many marched countryside... nobody [globalsts/established elites] gave a damn!
... The only thing that can be done is to get your followers [Tommy fans] and I say the veterans and the football lads... they have got, and I really think the best thing they can do, is join UKIP and give [entrenched globalist politicians] a run.
This should be a movement of REAL PEOPLE, funnelled through a political party because...
... these people [entrenched globalist politicians]... they are not going to do anything about this [Islam and Muslims in the UK] UNTIL THEY FEAR THEY MIGHT LOSE THEIR SEATS.
I wrote already that it's time to get political and stop digital protesting.
Lord Pearson mentioned that in the UK, 40% of youths under 15 are Muslim, compared to only 7 or 8 percent of British natives, "of us" as he bluntly puts it. These demographic FACTS are not going away. The UK and N. America has perhaps a chance yet in the next decade or two to reverse and save themselves. That's it.
None of us are saving The West by sitting at a computer.
And if I wrote it and believe it... then maybe it is time for me to act on my own words and decide on a new strategy to save my country and our people, "us", Europeans, Anglo-Saxons, white folk.
Strength & Honor